| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
HDfury

Joined: 22 Dec 2010 Posts: 471
|
Posted: Wed May 02, 2012 6:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| crash27 wrote: | I'm sure they will sell more because they look cooler but that makes the decision about sales numbers not what is best for 3D. If you say we went with a mix of style and function then OK. They move away because of bad press about the way they make you look stipid so......
| HDfury wrote: |
All the futuristic glasses failed to compete with Bitcauldron/3Dmax glasses, even at blocking light, so what else you need to understand the plastic have nothing to do with the quality of the 3D effect ? |
I'm talking about direct light from any source being able to hit either side of the lens. Put direct light on your glasses while they are running to see the flicker. Then shade the lens from the direct source of light and watch the flicker go away. Why do not the 20 year old edimentional glasses need heavy frames all the way around?
You claim I have no brain. My last I.Q. test showed a score of 137. You can't show me wrong using logic so you hurl insults. An old if not well known trick of the unintelligent IMHO. |
I never stated you have no brain (you would not be able to type, would you ?) i stated that anyone with a brain can understand that active 3D is based on electronic more than on the glasses plastic design. if everyone is happy with bit cauldron performance while the design is very basic, then you should also understand this no ? you came here stating that plastic design is the only difference between Nvidia 1 and 2, i proved you were wrong, so what are you waiting for to update your mind ?
Are you agree to say that you were completely wrong when writing this ?
| Quote: | | There upgraded glasses were just different color lens and more light blocking | YES/NO ?
Also, i don't get your sentence about 20 year old glasses, did you have active shutter glasses 20 years ago ?
Active 3D effect quality is all about electronic and beeing able to tweak and fine tune the electronic to match your display frequency at perfection. _________________ User Manual: HDFury2,HDFury3,HDFury4
Designed for the ultimate picture quality, not piracy. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
crash27

Joined: 27 Apr 2012 Posts: 11 Location: Canada
|
Posted: Wed May 02, 2012 6:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| You deleted my post to win your argument I see. Good tactic! Why wast my time replying again? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
admin Site Admin
Joined: 16 Dec 2010 Posts: 36
|
Posted: Wed May 02, 2012 6:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| crash27 wrote: | | You deleted my post to win your argument I see. Good tactic! Why wast my time replying again? |
No he did not, i did ! and can't believe the patience he had with you.
Feel free to post here, it's a special thread for noobs who don't know what are the advantages of RF or who never heard of delay, duty cycle and so on... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
HDfury

Joined: 22 Dec 2010 Posts: 471
|
Posted: Wed May 02, 2012 6:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Well, just let him answer YES or NO to the question asked so we know if he is of good will or not. _________________ User Manual: HDFury2,HDFury3,HDFury4
Designed for the ultimate picture quality, not piracy. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
slackwarerobert
Joined: 27 Mar 2013 Posts: 11
|
Posted: Thu Mar 28, 2013 5:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Blinds, shades, light switches...... There are thousands of technological breakthroughs to stop ambient light. I even added a covered porch to stop that pesky stuff farther out. curse the tyrants in washington that ban having no windows and no extra doorways.
But interference is why I bought the samsung with bluetooth glasses. You can walk out of the kitchen and see the image come out of the tv from the side, still need to try a mirror to watch the guy sneaking up behind me. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|